.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Saturday, May 21, 2011

arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless

arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger workout
  • arnold schwarzenegger workout



  • WeegieMac
    Apr 14, 01:04 PM
    I'm glad more regular people are starting to notice this as well. As soon as I saw signs of it in 4.2.1 I knew this was the usual slow down we come to expect, although they started early this time around. :mad:

    I noticed it right away mate, and I thought I was being a little pernickety until I noticed more people cropping up in threads here and especially on the Apple discussion forums.

    If Apple had added features to iOS 4 over the 4.1-4.3 updates which would explain degraded performance, then fair enough, but Home Sharing and Personal Hotspot are the biggest new feature in the iOS 4 updates, and I don't honestly don't think for one second anyone is stupid enough to believe either impact the way the iPhone UI animates.

    Anyway, I've restored to 4.3.2 via iTunes and while the stock apps run perfectly, the real test is when the device has a load on it, so I'm going to install some third party apps and see how things go.

    Here's an advance hint ... it'll be the exact same as 4.3.2.





    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. 2011 shirtless. Arnold
  • 2011 shirtless. Arnold



  • Zman5225
    Jul 24, 04:45 PM
    in for one!

    Been waiting for this to be released since the mighty mouse was intially introduced.





    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger son
  • arnold schwarzenegger son



  • IbisDoc
    Apr 22, 05:10 PM
    Did Topolsky mention anything about that one cool feature....you know the one that makes little random spots of light bleed from the edges of the screen? Wondering if this quality feature made it from the new iPad to the new iPhone.





    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011



  • Moyank24
    Apr 30, 10:45 PM
    Can I get some wings at least?

    Appleguy will bring them to you when he leaves the kiddie party.



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011



  • DotComName
    Mar 31, 01:23 PM
    Apple, we all know the mouse is dead... stop wasting time coding mac apps to look like iPad apps and coding mac os to operate like iOS, just do the obvious: ditch the mac platform all together! Make larger iOS devices that allow for the manipulation of iOS apps in windowed form and there you go, desktop operating environment with iOS.

    touch input > mouse input





    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger photos
  • arnold schwarzenegger photos



  • littleman23408
    Sep 16, 05:41 PM
    Creedence Clearwater Revival - Cosmo's Factory
    http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4145/4996663207_2539377da3_m.jpg

    The Beatles - Abbey Road
    http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4087/4997270044_9f1041dc67_m.jpg



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. Arnold Schwarzenegger#39;s Son to
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger#39;s Son to



  • zasr4325
    Jan 29, 02:58 AM
    I'm currently testing one out :)

    I can see that the White keys are still underneath, but where did you get those black 'covers' (for lack of a better word) for the wireless keyboard in the background?





    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011 shirtless. Arnold+schwarzenegger+2011; Arnold+schwarzenegger+2011. 0815. Apr 20, 02:05 PM. seriously did you not watch the video?
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011 shirtless. Arnold+schwarzenegger+2011; Arnold+schwarzenegger+2011. 0815. Apr 20, 02:05 PM. seriously did you not watch the video?



  • rayz
    Aug 1, 10:54 AM
    I only clarified because it didn't seem like you got it. If you did, then my apologies.

    No problem

    As for the time it took Apple to create a stable version I disagree...the first desktop version that was available came out in March 2001. I would say that Jaguar was the first completely stable version, which came out in August 2002. Even if you disagree my PowerBook has been completely stable since I got it (it shipped with 10.2.7) in September 2003. Just over two years. My XP boxes have been far less stable.

    Well, I actually didn't have a problem with any version of XP, even before I had installed XP2. The first releases of OSX were pretty hellish for me. Panther was fine; then I installed Tiger and I was back in beta land, which is when I decided to move the business-related stuff back to XP and just do the fun stuff on OSX. Fortunately Apple released a fix a few weeks after they released Tiger.

    Also, Apple charges because they offer new things to the operating system, not just stability fixes. OS X updates are also cheaper.

    Well, I don't think they've really done that much. They've mashed a few extra look and feels into the UI, added dashboard (and I'm not even sure they invented that), Automator (wich I really should try out). Apart from that, the OS is pretty much the same as it was when it was released (though a lot more stable obviously).

    It's an excellent piece of work, but it certainly should be cheaper because when you get right down to it, they didn't actually have to write it from scratch.

    Timepass,
    It's still called the Blue Screen of Death. If OS X had one, it'd be called the same thing. The point is that it's Blue, not that it's caused by .dll errors or incorrect memory addressing.

    Er ... OSX does have one, but it appear to be black (http://www.applematters.com/index.php/section/comments/ask-apple-matters-os-x-crashes-afterall/) ....



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011 shirtless. Arnold Schwarzenegger; Arnold Schwarzenegger. Bibulous. Sep 19, 04:52 PM. Don#39;t forget that Apple servers will be the
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011 shirtless. Arnold Schwarzenegger; Arnold Schwarzenegger. Bibulous. Sep 19, 04:52 PM. Don#39;t forget that Apple servers will be the



  • digitalnicotine
    Jan 31, 04:37 PM
    Say hello to Odin...

    What a cutie! :)





    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger son
  • arnold schwarzenegger son



  • dethmaShine
    Apr 26, 12:07 PM
    I wish everything were free. :rolleyes:

    On another note, if they need me to pay for streaming 'my own' content, then they can forget about it.

    If they are going to stream all kinds of content, unlimited number of times, then $7, $10 and I'm happy.

    But again, the basic service should be free.



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011



  • firestarter
    Apr 24, 01:18 PM
    I'm going to ask a dumb question here: if the victim had already undergone the surgery, then how could the perpetrators know the victim was genetically male? I'm not trying to be snarky, but there's a logical disconnect, unless I'm missing something.

    By some other aspect of her character I guess.

    It is a dumb question (sorry). Female toilets only have stalls, so the victim's surgical status is moot.





    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011



  • Gasu E.
    Jun 16, 08:52 AM
    Surprising how heated the debate on this can get - I think it's a great story.

    Boy makes mistake (as does mother, in not supervising him closely enough). The mother asks for help from Apple, and Apple complies even though they don't have to. The boy, and his mother are very unlikely to make the same mistake again - and the same holds for any parent reading this story! :p

    Sounds like a win - win - win - win scenario to me!

    Yes, but you are you missing the fact that this is an ideal opportunity for the armchair libertarians to wail about how intrusive the government is. :rolleyes:



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger son
  • arnold schwarzenegger son



  • Master-D
    Apr 4, 02:16 AM
    My 1 year-old a couple of days before his first birthday (click for larger).

    http://gallery.me.com/crebelein/100053/IMG_5637/web.jpg

    He will love this pic when he is older. tough like rocky :)





    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011



  • appleguy123
    Apr 27, 04:54 PM
    Very odd not to vote for the next highest vote getter to save yourself. Even if he is a fellow wolf.

    In this game there is a kamikaze and a infectious wolf. Strategy plays a part when they can control who gets lynched.



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011 shirtless. Hollywood star arnoldshow; Hollywood star arnoldshow. MacSA. Sep 4, 05:00 AM
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011 shirtless. Hollywood star arnoldshow; Hollywood star arnoldshow. MacSA. Sep 4, 05:00 AM



  • Pandaboots
    Jan 26, 03:29 AM
    I've lost a bit. :( actually quite a lot. I bought at around 170ish a while ago in prepare for the surge of macworld like last year but am at a bit of a loss right now. I think my avatar shows my recent mood.

    You haven't lost anything until you actually sell. Maybe this story will help:

    Apple was the last stock I bought back during the dot com days of the late 90's/early 2000's. I got burned trying to buy and sell all the dot coms on a daily basis, so I decided that I'd "invest" what I had left in Apple. Anyway, I bought Apple at $49/share in the year 2000. I thought it was a great price for whatever reason. Guess what? The price fell to around $7 within a very short period of time. Go look at a chart and you will see the cliff in which I speak of. However, I didn't lose my cool. I was in it for the long haul, so I maintained my position. I think patience is key to investing. Long story short, I did sell at $200 recently because I wanted to diversify those earnings and made a 720% return on my investment. So essentially, my original investment more than doubled itself each year I owned the stock. Why $200? I don't know, they had been so close to it for a while that it just sounded like a good round number. Anyway, I've had my fair share of doubts throughout my 7 year stint with Apple. I never dreamed Apple would be at $200/share. I've seen huge dips in their price in short periods of time, and I've also seen huge gains too. I've also had the stock split on me too. I've also felt it was doomed and there's no way it could ever do this or ever do that....

    Think about what all has happened with Apple since 2000: I've seen OS X launched, the iPod launched, iTunes launched, the switch to flat screens, all the computers they've launched, iLife, iWork, iPhone, :apple:TV, addition of movies and tv shows, etc. etc. So here's why I invested in Apple in 2000:

    1) I loved the company
    2) I loved their products
    3) I got excited about their products
    4) I was a proud customer
    5) I actually kept up with what was going on with the company (mainly through appleinsider and then macrumors shortly thereafter)
    6) I knew Apple was innovative and had good leadership
    7) I read all of the magazines related to Apple and talked everyones ear off about Apple

    However, I didn't choose Apple because of the iPod (it didn't exist then), or whether or not they expected their 2nd qtr to be better than their all time greatest qtr in history. In a nutshell I chose Apple because I believed in their products/their management team/and their ability to produce a quality product that excites people.

    So, I guess what you have to ask yourself is, in the next 7 years where will Apple be as far as products and innovation? Only thing I know is since re-investing in them in December at $182, they've released :apple:TV 2, movie rentals, Macbook Air, Time Capsule, an 8 core mac pro and a pink nano (lol). I think Apple is poised and ready to dominate other markets now..pfft iPod, that's so 5 years ago, blah blah blah, Apple owns the market and will maintain their dominance, now it's time for them to dominate in the movies and the phones and hopefully in computers.

    If you think they are done, then I'd be worried and sell your shares as soon as you can. If you still believe in Apple, like I do, average down your shares while you can and hold on. At these prices right now, Apple can easily double in value again. They are better positioned than ever to take on their competition. All my 7 reasons above are as true today as they were 7 years ago and 7 years prior to that. :)





    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011 shirtless. Arnold schwarzenegger; Arnold schwarzenegger. Eidorian. Apr 14, 01:10 PM. The real question that I haven#39;t seen anyone
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011 shirtless. Arnold schwarzenegger; Arnold schwarzenegger. Eidorian. Apr 14, 01:10 PM. The real question that I haven#39;t seen anyone



  • stroked
    Apr 24, 08:14 PM
    You just told me that you'd beat hell out of someone (http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=12453464&postcount=56).

    Non violent people don't tend to use assault to solve their problems.

    Do you have a daughter?



    more...


    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011



  • myamid
    Nov 4, 08:10 AM
    If it's taking you two minutes to resume a session and two minutes plus to suspend it, on that machine you mentioned the specs of, something is frickin' wrong with that machine.

    2.16 Core 2 Duo 20" iMac here, 2GB, stock 250GB drive, Parallels does the following:

    - it cold starts in 4 seconds
    - it boots my XP VM (512MB of RAM/8GB virtual hard disk) to the Desktop in 9
    - it suspended that same XP VM in 14
    - it restored that same XP VM in 11

    And that's with Crossover for Mac running several Windows apps in the background too, so some of my resources are already drained when I fired up Parallels and the VM. Memory usage at the moment for the entire machine is sitting at 1154MB of 2048MB, 69 tasks, 330 threads as measured by MenuMeters.

    So, give that box a tuneup or whatever, because you're certainly not getting the performance from Parallels that you should be getting. Also, check your VT-x flags under Parallels to make sure it's functioning properly.

    btw, this is Parallels build 1970, the latest and greatest, and I've had nothing but positive usage of Parallels since I bought it off the shelf in an Apple Store along with this iMac a month ago. 3 upgrades so far, no issues at all.

    bb

    I get similar performance on my slighly slower iMac.... And my VM images are on a less than ideal external FW drive!!! I'll second the opinion that if your system is significatly slower than this with Parallels, there's something VERY wrong with your Mac...





    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011



  • Frisco
    Apr 28, 06:47 PM
    I am still holding out for my Pink iPhone.





    arnold schwarzenegger son shirtless. arnold schwarzenegger 2011
  • arnold schwarzenegger 2011



  • kevin.rivers
    Jul 28, 10:14 AM
    Wooooow, we're straying off topic.

    Back to the topic...

    Don't you guys think that the iPod being overtaken is about as likely as Apple overtaking HP, Dell, and Gateway?

    I just don't see it happening, Apple has a really high following when it comes to mp3 players and when people have had an iPod, they upgrade to a new iPod, not a Zune.

    There is no incentive to go to a Zune. Same DRM, same features. The people who hate the iPod and buy Creative aren't switching to Zune. They don't want to be locked into DRM. So unless microsoft really does something innovative it is just another player in a sea of non-iPods.

    EDIT: I mean same DRM in the sense that the download are locked by DRM, not exactly the same type.





    Demosthenes X
    Apr 12, 09:01 AM
    Sounds plausible. I don't know what else Apple can add to its existing iPod line besides small improvements... a few of their recent "revolutions" (buttonless Shuffle, touch-screen nano) have actually been steps backward, imo.





    csalm87
    Apr 15, 03:09 PM
    Looks like mostly bug fixes. Only thing new I have found is the result of putting a window out of focus.

    iCal is still same design too.

    Looks like the website icons are showing up now. They didn't before, at least for me no matter what I tried. Yay.





    firestarter
    May 1, 11:32 PM
    you guys are really reaching ... Osama Bin Laden is as big as they come as far as Terrorism goes ... that is a fact.

    Well, as long as you feel a lot better now he's gone... That's the important thing isn't it?





    bedifferent
    Apr 12, 08:06 PM
    Because it uses mDP for the connection. It would be confusing to users to have a data only port that looks like their video port (of course this really only affect Macs since most PC's come with DVI/HDMI...)

    So aesthetics is the issue. Interesting. Well, I suppose recognizing the label to differentiate between the mini-DisplayPort and ThunderBolt ports would be a good step (a lot of people often mis-guess the USB connection). I realize it's a in a format similar to the mini-DisplayPort, however could this change? Either way, if that's their excuse it seems fairly thin.





    syc23
    Apr 26, 03:28 PM
    You wouldn't work for your boss for zero salary so why would you expect Apple to invest millions in their data centers and give this away for free?